Pamela Mae
12/12/2009
3:30:27 PM | Deb#2
I so agree.
And I am going to ask you a question, which will be
a necessary repeat.
Do you think its more practical to stick to the main protocol and then have testing done to pin point the anti fungals needed to kill the fungus which causes the this the that the this and that etc etc etc.
?
You and I Deb have had this a long long time. We know now we just needed to tweek things a bit from mels protocol which was soundly based and hit all -fungus,bacteria,parasite.
I still am blown away at the fact the tests are proving mels protocol to be a sound basic starting point.
And also grateful to mel for being humble enough man to say'yes through testing lets do the tweeking,'BUT DO NO HARM'
In my mind the testing does sound basic re adjusting and tweeking to match ones own body make up.
And now the GPL docs who can read testing and re group all necessary directives.
The human body is a variable after all,so we progress and adjust and show symptoms in different ways and in different levels.
The testing does sound basic re adjusting
We know that GPL is subscribed to almost all ins. to medicare,and has a payment plan.
Its not easy I know...
I just know I have been working so very hard for everyone.I am really really trying to help with all that I am.I am giving it all I have.All.
I just so- - do not want anyone to hurt themselves.
Blessings
Pamela Mae
|
